Perceived susceptibility and vaccine hesitancy among mothers in completing basic immunization: A qualitative study
https://doi.org/10.52235/lp.v7i1.705
Keywords:
health belief model, immunization programs, perception susceptibility, vaccination hesitancyAbstract
Background: Immunization is a highly effective public health intervention to reduce child morbidity and mortality. However, declining immunization coverage in several regions of Indonesia, including North Bengkulu Regency, reflects growing vaccine hesitancy. In Arga Makmur, concerns about post-immunization adverse events (KIPI) influence mothers’ decisions, indicating a shift in perceived susceptibility within the Health Belief Model.
Objective: This study aimed to explore mothers’ perceived susceptibility related to childhood immunization and how these perceptions contribute to vaccine hesitancy in Arga Makmur, North Bengkulu.
Methods: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted between October and November 2022 in the working area of the Argamakmur Community Health Center, North Bengkulu Regency, Indonesia. Nine mothers of children with incomplete immunization status were selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s six-phase thematic analysis.
Results: Four major themes emerged from the analysis: (1) fear that injections could cause illness in children, (2) suspicion regarding the safety of vaccines and medications, (3) perceptions that children were physically weak or unfit to receive immunization, and (4) fatalistic beliefs reflected in surrender to divine destiny. Mothers tended to perceive the risks associated with vaccination as more immediate and threatening than the risks posed by vaccine-preventable infectious diseases. These perceptions were reinforced by misinformation, social narratives, and personal observations of post-immunization reactions.
Conclusion: Vaccine hesitancy among mothers in Arga Makmur is strongly associated with a shift in perceived susceptibility—from concern about infectious diseases toward fear of vaccine-related risks. Addressing this imbalance requires effective risk communication, strengthening trust in healthcare providers, counteracting misinformation, and implementing culturally and religiously sensitive health promotion strategies to improve immunization acceptance.
Downloads
References
Akbar, M. A. (2026). Trustworthiness in qualitative inquiry as a foundation for rigorous research. Indonesian Journal of Health Services, 3(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.63202/ijhs.v3i1.133
Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
Azizi, A. (2024). Digital health misinformation and vaccine confidence in developing countries. Journal of Global Health Communication, 9(1), 45–58.
BPS. (2021). National Socioeconomic Survey (Susenas): Immunization Coverage Report. Badan Pusat Statistik.
Champion, V. L., & Skinner, C. S. (2008). The Health Belief Model. In Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. Jossey-Bass.
Dillyana, T. A. (2019). Hubungan Pengetahuan, Sikap Dan Persepsi Ibu Dengan Status Imunisasi Dasar Di Wonokusumo. Jurnal PROMKES, 7(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.20473/jpk.v7.i1.2019.67-77
Dinkes Bengkulu Utara. (2024). Laporan Capaian Imunisasi Tahunan Kabupaten Bengkulu Utara.
Dube, E., Ward, J. K., & MacDonald, N. E. (2022). Vaccine Acceptance, Hesitancy, and Refusal in the 21st Century. Journal of Health Communication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2022.2032123
Dubé, E., Ward, J. K., & MacDonald, N. E. (2022). Vaccine hesitancy: Clinical and public health implications. Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics, 18(5), 1–8.
Kemenkes RI. (2024). National Immunization Program Evaluation Report. Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2004). Nursing Research : Principles and Methods. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Saptarini, I., & Mutahar, R. (2023). Determinants of Vaccine Hesitancy among Mothers in Urban Areas: A Psychological Perspective. Journal of Public Health Research. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036231175621
Saptarini, I., & Mutahar, R. (2023). Determinants of vaccine hesitancy among mothers in Indonesia. Kesmas: National Public Health Journal, 18(2), 89–98.
Schulz, D. N., Kremers, S. P. J., Vandelanotte, C., van Adrichem, M. J. G., Schneider, F., Candel, M. J. J. M., & de Vries, H. (2014). Effects of a web-based tailored multiple-lifestyle intervention for adults: a two-year randomized controlled trial comparing sequential and simultaneous delivery modes. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(1), e26. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3094
Smith, L. G. (2023). Risk perception and vaccination decision-making in parents. Vaccine Psychology Review, 15(2), 102–118.
Smith, L. G., et al. (2023). Omission Bias and the Vaccine Decision-Making Process. Medical Decision Making.
WHO. (2023). Behavioral and Social Drivers of Vaccination: Tools and Practical Guidance for Achieving High Uptake.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dzikra Fitria Amita, Helza Risdianti, Aurellia Firstania, Tsania Ayu Zaharany, Sartika Rajagukguk, Risyda Ma'arifatul Khoirot, Dinda Nur Fajri, Annisa Pratiwi Gunawan, Tobi Pitora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
